Formula: This is one of the thicker liquid concealers and it's similar to L'Oreal's Infallible More than Concealer. While the formula is creamy, it doesn't always blend well on my skin. I find it's best to combine it with a glowy, moisturising foundation that helps it blend seamlessly by adding moisture under it, while on matte foundations or bare skin, blending isn't smooth and can't even start to cake. It's not always like that, but it bothers me that it can happen at all because I don't know on which day I can pick this up and rely on it looking good. 

Coverage and finish: This has close to full coverage. Layering can be problematic, if my skin isn't well moisturised, as it sets quickly. Over spots it looks cakey, just like every concealer matte concealer under the sun, but it stays on better than for example NYX Bare with Me. Finish is matte and this usually quickly becomes very flat looking, just like all matte high coverage concealers do on me. I'm honestly not sure if I'd even see a difference between Shape Tape original and this on my dry skin. 

Staying power: It's still on at the end of the day, but faded. I wore NYX and this one on each day with a moisturising foundation under it (Oriflame Giordani Gold Age Defy) and while NYX one was almost gone, this one still covered enough and didn't become patchy. Both disappeared from the sides of my nose. I set both with Hourglass Ambient Lighting Finish Powder. 

Shade: I picked the lightest shade because there's no useful comparison pictures online, so I went with the lightest because that's what I always do. It turns out 8B Porcelain Beige is actually too light for me, but I don't mind. It's one of the lightest shades I've tried so far. Undertone is neutral. 

Packaging: The applicator is big and holds a lot of product. It's similar to the L'Oreal Infallible More than Concealer. 

Price: It was 30 € - expensive considering L'Oreal's More than Concealer is very similar. 

These are definitely very good eyeshadows, high quality. However, to me they don't stand out among some cheaper ones, such as Colourpop, Artdeco and Milani, as well as high end ones (Urban Decay, Too Faced, theBalm). They certainly don't have an immediate fully opaque colour payoff like I've seen at the discontinued L.O.V. Magnetic eyeshadows, which based on reviews I kind of expected the have. I'm not saying it's a bad palette at all, but it's so hyped up and my expectations were really high and turned out they do the same as the cheaper (fantastic) formulas. I did a video on IG/TT, showing how Colourpop's eyeshadows are equal performers. I compared it with Colourpop's side by side, so one on each eye and performance was very similar. Coloupop's matte eyeshadows are actually creamier, but both blend well. Natasha Denona's eyeshadows are all well pigmented, they blend easily and last all day on my non-oily eyelids - maybe that's the reason why I don't find these anything special, the fact eyeshadows very rarely crease on me because I have no oil during the day. It's possible those that have problems like that find these more impressive. 

I find the colours in the pan very deceptive based on the result I get on the eyelids and the official swatches look different to mine. I expected old gold shades, something like Patina from Mac and Artdeco's eyeshadow 245, but though they look like that in the pan, on my skin the whole look ends up warmer and with the first bronze shade as well as the lightest gold shade look completely coppery on me - something that happens with gold shades in general on my skin tone, but apart from the lightest shimmery shade I didn't think it will look this warm. For reference on my look I used the central colour on the eyelids as it's the only I actually like and I think works on me, while with the bronze as the focus shade, the whole look looks orange-y. In terms of versatility of looks, you're going to have to look someplace else, as I always do the same look with it, but the way I do my makeup this has three lid shades, one transition and one for the outer corners. I'm sure others are way more creative with it. 

I don't have dupes for the shades, but overall the Colourpop Going Coconuts is reasonably similar, especially since Glam ends up warmer on me. Quality of eyeshadows is very similar, with Going Coconut's shades matte shades being creamier. Both have fall down during application and like at all shimmery eyeshadows (and highlighters), the shimmers ends up all over the cheeks at the end of the day.  

I ordered these a long time ago. Cult Beauty has this brand and it ships worldwide.

Formula feels creamy when I swipe it on the skin and it blends nicely when you have a good amount to work with. Unfortunately I can only use the smallest dot and it's not easy to work with, or at least fast. I can get an nice, seamless blend with diffused edges, but at such a small amount I miss the creaminess that would make it easier to blend - over a matte foundation this formula doesn't work well for me. I've tried mixing it with a concealer, but I can't get the amount right and quickly ends up being too much. 

Shade Grace is not what I imagined based on swatches. I expected a cool pink, something leaning to mauve, but it's a much warmer pink and blended out it pull a hint towards orange, so I don't like it as much as Essence's Baby got Blush 10 Tickle Me Pink or Primark's Liquid Blush in Light Pink.

Staying power is good. It's still on at the end of the day, though somewhat faded.

The doe foot applicator has an indentation that holds a lot of product. 

This was about 25 €.