Texture: It's a classic liquid foundation, creamy enough that it doesn't run when pumped out of the bottle. It blends so nicely into the skin, leaving it natural-looking. It's similar to how Bourjois Healthy Mix looks, so like there's no foundation on.   

Coverage and finish: Coverage is light to medium at most. I need another layer under the eyes, but applying more on spots still isn't enough. So this is a formula for those that don't mind the coverage isn't perfect. Finish is glowy-dewy in the summer, while now it's already less shiny, but it's still very healthy looking. It's definitely a foundation most suited for dry skin.

Staying power: Most foundations last ok on me, or at least I don't pay much attention to where it fades as my skin isn't that uneven, but this is a light coverage, hydrating glowy foundation which never last as long as matte ones. 

Shade: Lightest shade Porcelain is one of the best matching shades I've found, so I appreciate this foundation even more because of that. It's about the same depth as Revlon's 110 Ivory and undertone is cool-neutral.

On this picture MasterCreation is very old and has turned darker. Originally it was about the same shade as Porcelain.

Scent: It has no scent. 

Packaging: This comes in a premium-looking bottle with a gold cap. The latter is of course plastic. Pump is precise at dispensing. 

A foundation that claims to have skin care benefits, combining a serum and coverage. This one has a bit of vitamin C in a  3-o-ethyl ascorbic acid form, which is by now nothing special and it can't compare to some foundations or BB/CC creams that have a ton of skin care ingredients - but it doesn't matter, what's important is how it looks on the skin. This one claims to have a "second skin effect", a lightweight formula, an illuminating effect and SPF 15. I got sent a shade much too dark for me, so I wore this for a short while before I took it off and there was no full day test.

Texture: Formula isn't super liquid as you might expect from the packaging, but it is regardless lightweight on the skin and it blends easily. It's similar to Catrice's Nude Drop Tinted Serum, so it has quite a lot of pigment in a light formula. It becomes dry to the touch quickly on my skin, doesn't slip into lines nor crease under the eyes or emphasize pores.

Coverage and finish: Finish is slightly glowy without looking or feeling greasy. Unlike Maybelline Superstay Serum it doesn't have shimmer in the formula, but the glowy effect is similar. Coverage is hard for me to asses, since 3 Medium is so much darker than my skin tone. Maybe light-medium, as my freckles are visible.

Scent: Foundation has a strong floral scent.

Shade: There are a only 5 shades, 4 are sold here. 3 Medium is something like Revlon's 300 shades in terms of depth, undertone looks cool. I tested shade 1 Light in the shop and it's not for very pale skins, so there is no match for me in this range. 

Packaging: Glass bottle with a pipette. The formula is too thick for such a packaging, so the pipette has a hard time picking up product. 

If you're one of those lucky ones who can find a match in this very limited shade range, it's a foundation worth a try, as I think it's better than Catrice's Nude Drop and Maybelline's Superstay Serum. 

Pigmentation is ok, I need two (light) layers and wish blending were just a little smoother - not that it's bad, but their baked blushes are better. Finish is matte, so I feel this looks a bit flat on my skin, but again I'm comparing this to the really good Hi-Tech formula which is baked blushes with tiny shimmer that add dimension. Shade Coral Pink is for those that love peachy shades, while on me I feel it ends up leaning too much to orange. I liked the look of shade 01, however, since I prefer the lovely formula of Hi-Tech, I'm no longer than drawn to add it to my collection. 

Staying power is where it truly shines. I applied this at around 11 AM and it was still looking nicely fresh at 10 PM. The foundation I wore was nothing special, a cheap Eveline one. 

Packaging is thinner than at Hi-Tech and it doesn't have an added brush (the one at baked blushes is useless anyway). 

Nude Bouquet looks lighter when freshly swatched than how it oxidises on the lips. It ends up a medium beige-brown on me, quite dark. On the swatch on my arm it's fully oxidised. 

I think these were just repackaged, as I had several shades in the previous bottles and these feel about the same. However, these two have quite different formulas. 20 Soft Pink is almost clear with one coat, second also doesn't get you full opacity and at third the tips are still visible. It's not my favourite nail polish when it comes to application, the formula is thick and I need three layers, so it ends up a bit too much for my liking. But it's a good neutral shade. 

130 Chic Violet is a medium violet with a smooth formula that needs almost just one coat (tips are minimally visible), but I always apply two. Staying power of both is good on me, but most nail polishes last well on my nails.

 I've worn both the old version and the new one side by side and the new one thicker, it's has a lot more shine, in fact it's verging on greasy-looking (tested in the summer) and it doesn't set. The old one had that perfect level of glow, so it's a shame they felt the need to change that. I can deal with this change, since my skin is normal-dry and most foundations turn matte on me in time (this one is getting less shiny on my skin since it's already cooler outside), but those that considered this their winter foundation and have combination skin, may feel disappointed. I've certainly read enough complaints about the new formula on Bourjois's website. It still looks good on the skin, perhaps for a while less natural as it's very glowy in the summer, so it's more like you'd apply a shiny moisturiser (when I tested them side by side in hot summer the difference in finish was very noticeable). It's still one of those foundations that doesn't look like heavy makeup and blends into the skin seamlessly. 

Before/after of the old formula from a review. New has the same level of coverage:

It still has the same fruity scent and staying power is the same, which was never impressive without some help from other makeup (primer and/or powder and/or setting spray). 

I see there is a new shade 49.5N, which might be the light shade I was waiting for. 50.5 still exists with the added N, I'm guessing for neutral. Sadly I don't have the old shade 50 to compare it with the new 50C. I got another deep shade 56W, which probably corresponds to the 56 shade in the old packaging.  

Formula is a thin, liquid formula in a sort of a light grey shade - it's completely clear on the skin. There no big visible shimmer in it, yet it leaves a lovely glow on the skin. Even after the primer becomes dry to the touch, the skin has that shine. I have no idea how they managed that or I'm just not seeing the shimmer because it's so fine. It start of slightly sticky, but then sets to a dry-to-the touch finish. Currently I'm sporting shiny SPFs, so I don't need such a primer in my routine, but it may be very handy in colder months to add some life to matte-looking dry skin. There's no blurring at this formula and I don't find it particularly smoothing, so it just adds a glow while leaving the texture and skin tone like it is. 

Left with primer and right without.

It contains a small amount of panthenol (B5), vitamin E, vitamin C (Ascorbyl Glucoside), a weak version of vitamin A (Retinyl Palmitate), hyaluronic acid and some extracts. It has a typical Healthy Mix fruity scent.

This concealer has been around for a while, but I never tried, so I'm not sure if they changed this formula too. I was a big fan of the 123 Perfect CC Eye Cream and Radiance Reveal concealers, but the discontinued them. Sadly, I couldn't test Healthy Mix one properly because shade 52 is too dark for me. 

I can't really say what the coverage is because of the depth of the shade, but maybe about medium, I don't think it's full coverage. It is an thick concealer for a Bourjois formula and it thicker than the foundation. Blending takes a bit longer, but it still melts into the skin on the edges. Finish is glowy and this is a moisturising formula suitable for dry skin. It doesn't feel as nice as Radiance Reveal, as it's thicker, but it's comparable to popular matte concealers. It's kind of like Milani's Conceal + Perfect concealer, except it's glowy and moisturising instead of matte. I saw the lightest shade is 51 and I have a feeling it's also too dark for me - in any case I find the formula thick for my liking.  

This powder is more described as a powder foundation as it mentions medium coverage. It claims it has a luminous matte finish and anti-fatigue blurring capabilities. I always wanted to try this, since I saw someone praising it in her empties, but sadly this is again in a shade much too dark for me, it's basically a bronzer. It makes me look so unevenly tanned, so I can't wear this. It does have a sort of a luminous matte finish, as it takes away a lot of the shine from SPFs and foundations (I don't have oily skin) and there is still some glow left.  In a thin coat it doesn't take away much of the shine from the very shiny Healthy Mix foundation and concealer combination, so yes, it leaves the skin naturally radiant. Applied with a sponge, it takes most of the shine off and doesn't look flat, but it did make my foundation look flaky when looked up close on my chin. Based on how tanned it makes me look and swatching, it looks like it has some coverage, but again I can't really test these dark shades properly.

Like Physicians Formula packaging, this one has a bottom compartment with a sponge and a mirror. 

I never expected Bourjois would expand the Healthy Mix line into mascaras. I said in my first impression that I feel this mascara needs some time to become thicker and better, as when freshly applied the formula was awfully thin and it only managed to add some length. I was right and it became considerably better in two weeks. Formula thickened and now it's a wonderfully volumising formula, comparable to Pupa's and it's easier to fan out the lashes as well. 

Even though it adds a great amount of volume and looks good before my lashes drop, I just don't like it because it's a greasy formula and my glasses are constantly smudgy when I wear it - this problem (likely) won't affect you, so ignore it, but I just can't deal with this formula. Lashes stay reasonably soft with several coats of mascara. 

These two have such different formulas for the same line. 

The light pink 125 is a thick, but sheer shade with first coat and opaque with a third. It's a beautiful shade that reminds me of a better Essie Fiji. It lasted a normal amount on my nails, comparable to other brands (everything lasts over a weeks on me). 

300 is opaque in one coat, a lovely gel-like smooth formula. Shade is a marsala brown-rosy red